![archicad vs autocad archicad vs autocad](https://i0.wp.com/devcrack.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DCON3o_XgAEZe2x.jpg)
Gateway East was used as the project location to simulate the real-world scenario, Lat and Long values were obtained from Google Map.ġ., Start settings from ARCHICAD. Note: We need to set both Lat/Long and UTM as they are used by ARCHICAD and Revit respectively as project locations. Note: Measured clockwise from positive Y axis. This can be the exact value coming from the surveyor and no issues of calculation accuracy. The steps will be further explained in the later part of this blog.ĭisplay the PBP, select it and enter the True North’s angle. Note: Measured anti-clockwise from positive X axis.Īs both ARCHICAD and Revit works differently the user need to get this input from a IFC file exported from Revit with correct settings and set it graphically in ARCHICAD. True North can be set via Options/Project Preferences/ Project Location… Requires calculation or reference from surveyor’s CAD (DWG) file.ĭisplay the PBP, select it and enter the UTM values (Northing and Easting). UTM value will be exported as coordinates of the origin by placing a SP object. Revit uses Lat and Long for simulation purpose.
![archicad vs autocad archicad vs autocad](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/716CCnOCL5L.jpg)
It is approximate as there is no input option for exact value. Lat and Long can be set via Manage/ Project Location/ Location. Lat and Long can be entered via Options /Project Preferences/ Project Location… Note: ARCHICAD’s SP is not equal to Revit’s SP. User can enter any coordinate value (UTM value) from the real world coordinate system. These are flexible reference points that can be moved anytime during the project. The origin is fixed, there is an option to set Lat and Long from Project Location dialog and an option to set the Northing and Easting by placing a Survey Point (SP) object.Ĭoordinate sytem uses survey point (SP) and project base point (PBP).
#Archicad vs autocad how to
To address that I tested the settings of both ARCHICAD and Revit and share the result via this blog.īefore going into how to do the settings we need to understand how both tools work and various coordinate systems available for us to use.Ĭoordinate system is similar to traditional CAD system which is required for CAD (DWG/DGN) exchange. I received some requests to handle Northing and Easting (UTM) as well. In my previous blogs the focus was only on Latitude(Lat) and Longitude(Long). Or one should be able to compositionally crosshatch an elevation and have the hatch adjusted if the model is changed.Decided to re-visit coordinate settings for projects that requires IFC exchange between ARCHICAD and Revit in this blog. For instance, one should be able to add the windowsills on the elevations, even if they do not appear in the three-dimensional mode. The current sections and elevations in AutoCAD are only usable to trace over because they are missing a proper layer structure and the possibility to be edited while still linked to the model. This demonstrates that AutoCAD is easier to use in this aspect.
![archicad vs autocad archicad vs autocad](https://autocad-specialist.ru/images/uroki-archicad/video/22_Kak_zadat_dlinu_steni_v_Arhikade/dlina-steni_introimg.jpg)
For example, a parapet wall can be created by shaping the wall in an elevational view, where as in ArchiCAD, one can either create it as a shaped library object to be inserted where required or construct a false roof of the right height and pitch to which the wall can be trimmed. AutoCAD bypasses this problem better by showing a simultaneous plan, multiple elevations and sections, and of most importance, make the editing tools available in all views. This is great for documentation but very constraining for the design process. Yet ArchiCAD constrains one to work in plan from the start from this the other views are created. A plan really needs to grow out of the functional and aesthetic requirements of a project. AutoCAD is a …show more content… One only produces a plan drawing when one has resolved the elevations and layouts. Most designing today is based on the actual structural appearance one will perceive from the exterior, rather than the functional use of the interior although both are taken into consideration. Design processes today have been reversed from designing from the inside to the outside, to designing from the outside to the inside. Both are very productive design tools but each has its own defects in certain areas of the design process. Two of the main programs in many architectural firms today are AutoCAD2000 and ArchiCAD 6.5.
#Archicad vs autocad software
Architectural design today has moved from designing by hand to designing with several different software programs that have made the job much easier.